A
Meta-Analytic Review of Findings from National Samples on Psychological
Correlates of Child Sexual Abuse
Bruce
Rind [*] Philip
Tromovitch The
Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 34, No.3, 1997 pp. 237 - 255
|
|
(a) CSA causes psychological harm, | |
|
(b) this harm is pervasive, | |
|
(c) this harm is intense, and | |
|
(d) boys and girls experience CSA equivalently. |
However, with few exceptions, these reviewers have included in their reviews mostly studies using clinical and legal samples; these samples cannot be assumed to be representative of the general population.
To evaluate the implications and conclusions of these reviewers, we conducted a literature review of seven studies using national probability samples, which are more appropriate for making population inferences.
We
found that, contrary to the implications and conclusions contained in
previous literature reviews that were focused on biased samples, in the general
population. CSA is not associated with pervasive harm and that harm, when it
occurs, is not typically intense.
Further, CSA experiences for males and females are not equivalent: a
substantially lower proportion of males reports negative effects.
Finally, we found that conclusions about a causal link between CSA and
later psychological maladjustment in the general population cannot safely be
made because of the reliable presence of confounding variables.
We concluded by cautioning that analysis at the population level does not
characterize individual cases: When CSA is accompanied by factors such as force
or close familial ties, it has the potential to produce significant harm.
[*] Correspondence should be sent to Bruce Rind, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122. E. mail; rind@vm.temple.edu.